References

A drawing that reaches METALPET stays at METALPET. The request form carries an option for a non-disclosure agreement, and the rule applies without it as well: the customer name, the part, the quantity and any photographs of it are not published without written consent.

The rule cuts both ways. A website displaying ten logos also reveals who buys from that supplier, and what they buy.

Without customer names, what remains are the facts about the company, the same in all our material. No customer name appears anywhere on this site, not even in the company history: 2004 is recorded there as the start of exporting, not as a list of buyers.

1998

The company is founded in a workshop with four conventional machines, one heat-treatment furnace and one grinding machine.

2004

The start of exporting: the first direct deliveries to Germany and the Czech Republic, covering more than 150 part numbers. The product range diversifies and the workshop grows to 380 m².

2019

The hall is extended to 800 m². The machine park was built up gradually, over the years, not in a single year.

Read on

Each has its own page, written around what the sector asks of a part and of its documentation.

• Energy
• Rail
• Hydraulics and pneumatics
• Mechanical and plant engineering
• Industrial automation
• Heavy equipment
• Instrumentation and measurement

See all

Four documents, three of them already public on this site and printable immediately. The fourth is provided on request.

The capability profile

Work envelope, processes and batch documents, on one printable page.

The full machine list

The whole park, with each machine’s specifications.

The documents that ship with the batch

A 3.1 or 3.2 material certificate to EN 10204, a dimensional report, traceability to the heat number.

Named references, on request

Asked for case by case, with that customer’s consent. Not promised in advance, because the consent is not ours to give.

Capability profile Machine list Quality and traceability

On two conditions, both mandatory: the customer’s written consent, and measured figures rather than estimates. The form is the same every time - the problem on the drawing, the manufacturing route chosen, the measured result - and the customer stays anonymous where they prefer it. A case study without those two conditions remains an account with no evidential value at supplier qualification.